Nature Decides

Nature decides. That also means your nature decides.

We often believe we control our choices, acting from a place of personal will. However, we exist as part of a greater pattern of nature that flows through us. We observe this pattern in our genetics, biochemistry, predispositions, early life conditioning, and various other aspects of our physical, emotional, and mental existence.

But what does that really mean? Science increasingly suggests that our decisions do not arise solely from conscious thought. Neuroscience, biology, and even quantum research indicate that much of what we call “choice” actually unfolds before we become aware of it.

We often perceive ourselves as making choices, but Human Design reveals that the mind does not act as the driver — it functions as the passenger, observing the journey rather than directing it. If the passenger controlled the vehicle, it would no longer qualify as a passenger.

Neuroscience appears to support this concept. Research by Benjamin Libet and later studies using fMRI indicate that the brain initiates decisions before we consciously recognize them. In other words, what we perceive as “choosing” often represents our mind rationalizing a process already set in motion at a deeper level.

Similarly, studies on the default mode network (DMN) — a brain network associated with self-referential thinking and over-analysis — suggest that excessive mental activity can disconnect us from presence and intuitive flow. This aligns with the idea in Human Design that the mind functions best as an observer and a tool for measurement rather than as the authority making decisions.

If the mind does not control decisions, what does? According to knowledge received by Ra Uru Hu in Human Design, the body directs our movement. Specifically, the magnetic monopole — a unifying force that keeps us on our unique trajectory — guides our path.

While mainstream physics has not yet fully confirmed the existence of magnetic monopoles, research into quantum coherence and biophotons suggests that biological systems function within structured electromagnetic fields. Some scientists propose that these fields organize and influence our movement at a fundamental level, much like the magnetic monopole described in Human Design.

Rather than struggling to create our path, we may recognize our path already unfolding. Jacqueline Hobbs (aka “Oracle Girl”) illustrates this with the metaphor of a cosmic bus — it arrives at precise moments, carrying us forward when we step on at the right time. But if we hesitate, we must sprint to catch up, requiring much more effort. Similarly, Human Design teaches that when we trust our body’s intelligence, we align with the natural rhythm of our trajectory rather than forcing or resisting life’s timing.

In Human Design, we access our most reliable nature through our definition, particularly our inner authority — the unique decision-making process for each person — which originates from within that definition. Once again, we see a parallel with recent scientific research that supports the idea that decision-making arises primarily from biological and embodied processes rather than mental control. A prominent example includes the gut-brain connection. The enteric nervous system (ENS), sometimes called the “second brain,” contains over 500 million neurons and connects with the brain via the vagus nerve.

The ENS plays a crucial role in processing emotions, regulating energy, and shaping gut-based responses — all of which influence decision-making. Research indicates that gut bacteria affect neurotransmitters such as dopamine and serotonin, which subsequently shape our mood, preferences, and ability to sense what feels right in the moment. This aligns with the Sacral and Solar Plexus Centers in Human Design, where decision-making emerges through embodied response and emotional clarity rather than mental analysis.

For individuals with Splenic Authority, decisions arise from immediate intuitive or instinctive awareness — a concept that aligns with research on subconscious pattern recognition. The brain constantly processes vast amounts of information beyond conscious awareness, allowing for quick, instinctual decisions that often prove remarkably accurate.

Emerging and established scientific research, along with Human Design, suggests that decision-making does not result from mental control but as an organic, embodied process. Nature functions with inherent efficiency — rather than dealing with fairness or unfairness, it follows timing, flow, and alignment.

Hobbs also highlights the visceral way nature communicates — not through analytical thought but bodily sensations and deep intuitive knowing. She distinguishes between the endless chatter of the mind and the quiet, embodied voice of nature that speaks through our physical experience. This idea resonates with research on the gut-brain connection and the role of the enteric nervous system (ENS) in decision-making. Just as Human Design teaches that decisions arise from our inner authority rather than mental control, we can navigate life with greater clarity and authenticity by listening closely to our internal signals.

The mind will always attempt to analyze, justify, or control, yet true alignment comes not from force but from surrendering to the intelligence that moves through us. As Hobbs suggests, nature does not wait, nor does it reprimand — it simply follows its course, inviting us to step into sync with its rhythm. When we listen deeply to our inner signals, rather than the ceaseless chatter of the mind, we move with life rather than against it.

Nature decides.

And when we release our resistance to this truth, we find ourselves not lost but profoundly supported—guided not by thought but by something far greater: nature’s silent, unwavering intelligence, guiding us forward in perfect time.

Only logged in members can view and post comments.

Related Articles